About
Logomotion
LogoMotion
is played by two competing alliances on a flat 27’ x 54’
foot field. Each alliance consists of three robots each. They compete
to hang as many inflated plastic shapes (triangles, circles, and
squares) on their grids as they can during a 2 minute and 15 second
match. The higher the teams hang their game pieces on their scoring
grid, the more points their alliance receives.
The
match begins with one 15-second Autonomous Period in which robots
operate independently of driver inputs and must hang Ubertubes to
score extra points. For the rest of the match, drivers control robots
and try to maximize their alliance score by hanging as many logo
pieces as possible. Any logo piece hung on the same peg as an Ubertube
receives double points. If teams assemble the logo pieces on their
scoring grids to form the FIRST logo (triangle, circle, square,
in a horizontal row in that order), the points for the entire row
are doubled.
The
match ends with robots deploying minibots, small electro-mechanical
assemblies that are independent of the host robot, onto vertical
poles. The minibots race to the top of the pole to trigger a sensor
and earn additional bonus points.
2011
Build Season Updates
Week 1 Activities
Following the Kickoff meeting, students and mentors discussed the
game strategy. They agreed our challenge is to build a drive train
is fast and maneuverable, a robotic arm that can pick up the inflatable
shapes and place them on the scoring area rack, and a mini-bot that
quickly ascends the score pole. Based on that assessment, we formed
four sub-teams: Drive Train, Special Ops 1 (arm), Special Ops 2
(mini-bot) and Programming.
During the first week, each of the build sub-teams used CAD (Computer
Aided Design) software to draft robot designs. Based on those drawings,
students cut parts for the robot frame and sent them to be welded.
In addition to robot specific activities, a group of students and
mentors constructed a game field which we will use to test robot
design and prepare for competitions.
Another group of students developed our 2011 logo, integrated it
into a t-shirt design and submitted it for printing.to robot specific
activities, a group of students and mentors also began constructing
a game field model which we will use to test robot design and prepare
for competitions.
Week
2 Activities
While Robot frame is off site being welded, the Drive Train sub-team
continued work by using CAD to integrate motors into the design.
Team ordered extra chain, links, and sprockets. We will use these
materials to control the Robot’s locomotion.
Special Ops Team 1, the “arm” sub-team, completed CAD
design of the robotic arm. We are using a chain drive to operate
the primary arm pivot and a pneumatic system to control the “claw”
and “wrist” movements.
Special Ops Team 2, the “mini-bot” team, is adapting
a Tetrix kit to make a customized miniature robot capable of quickly
moving up a vertical pole. The mini-bot will employ neodymium magnets
to grab the pole and an electronic motor to propel it upwards. Tetrix
kits are similar to an erector set. Neodymium magnets are the strongest
type of permanent magnets made
The USFirst organization provided new equipment to control motors.
The programming team is learning to use this equipment and integrate
it into robot design.
Week
3 Activities
The robot drive train welding is complete. The Drive Train Team
and the Special Ops Team 1, the “arm” team, are working
together to attach the arm to the frame. Some team members are also
working to construct the frame bumpers and sew bumper covers.
The
Programming Team completed basic programs for the motor controllers.
They are now waiting for build teams to finish robot construction.
Then they will integrate programming controls into the robot.
Special Ops Team 2, the “minibot” team, completed construction
of a working prototype. However, after experimenting with the prototype,
students decided they needed a faster minibot. So it was back to
the design stage. They removed gear boxes, which changed the gear
ratio thus increasing the minibot’s speed. They are now working
on a wheel and shaft assembly to propel the minibot.
Mini-bot team finally got bot to ascend score pole. After bot climbs
pole, pneumatics push a magnet out so it stays there. This addresses
concerns that after bot ascended pole, it would quickly slide down
and destroy components.
Behind the scenes – grant requests, assembling bumpers Including
sewing team numbers to fabric), creating a scouting sheet, button
design.
Week 4 Activities
Special
Ops Team 1, the "arm" team, attached the robot arm to
the drive train. They are now adjusting arm's linkage so that it
will fully retract within the robot body when not in use.
Special Ops Team 2, the "minibot" team, is still working
to optimize the minibot design. They have agreed on four inch wheels
with a 90 degree orientation. And they modified the gear boxes to
increase speed by removing gear stages.
The Programming Team is wiring the drive train and arm.
Because
the robot drive train is complete, students working on this team
were assigned to other projects
Students also worked on projects not associated with hands-on robot
building.
•
Because GE Aviation graciously offered to perform a design review,
sub-team captains are putting together a power point presentation
that includes CAD drawings, calculations, and solid descriptions
as well as game strategies.
• Other students are constructing a battery charging station.
The robot operates off of one battery, but it may only have sufficient
charge for one competition round. The team designed the robot so
they can easily swap out batteries. Our new station can charge up
to six batteries at a time.
• A third group of students put together a "test"
to help the team choose who will drive the robot during competitions.
It includes an interview, a problem solving components, and a manipulative
game to check dexterity.
• And yet a fourth group of students is preparing our submission
for the Wisconsin Regional Chairman's Award.
Week 5 Activities
As
arm and drive train construction is mostly complete, the programming
team installed wiring and controls. They are now writing the code
that will manage the robot operations.
We've
redesigned our minibot yet again. The new design takes into to account
engineering principles discussed during our design review at GE
Aviation.
Students
also evaluated potential drive team members based on interviews
and a skills test. Our drive team members are Ty, Jeff, Brendan,
and Karl.
Week 6 Activities
Though
most construction is complete, the team continues to optimize the
robot's operation. Most of this work falls on the shoulders of our
programming team: Their work this week included:
-
Completing the logic for the solenoids that controls that open
and close the robot's "claw."
-
Wiring the line sensors that control the robot during its autonomous
mode.
- Troubleshooting
drive issues, i.e., fixing a damaged motor controller.
- Developing
programming logic for the mini-bot deployment.
Our
competition drive team started practicing their robot moves.
|